You hire a strong engineer. Their interviews went great. Their first pull request looks solid.
Three weeks later, they ask a question in Slack that was already answered last month. Two months later, they accidentally break a system no one warned them about. Six months later, they still hesitate to touch large parts of the codebase.
At some point, you start wondering if the problem is them.
It usually is not.
For most distributed engineering teams, onboarding and knowledge sharing quietly break down long before anyone notices. The symptoms show up as slow ramp-up, repeated questions, fragile systems, and senior engineers becoming permanent human documentation.
This is not a people problem. It is a systems problem.
Why onboarding feels harder in distributed teams
In colocated teams, knowledge leaks naturally. You overhear conversations. You ask a quick question at a desk. You see who owns what.
In remote teams, none of that happens by default.
New engineers join into a world of Slack channels, GitHub repos, Jira boards, Linear issues, Google Docs, and calendars. Everything exists somewhere, but nothing is connected. Context is fragmented. History is invisible.
Most onboarding plans still assume that knowledge transfer is a one-time event. A few docs, a kickoff call, and some shadowing. That approach worked when teams sat together. It breaks down when work is asynchronous and distributed across tools.
Remote onboarding fails for three common reasons.
First, context is scattered. Decisions live in old pull requests, Slack threads, meeting notes, or someone’s memory.
Second, ownership is unclear. New hires do not know who to ask, and senior engineers do not know what knowledge they are implicitly holding.
Third, learning is reactive. Engineers only discover gaps when something breaks or when they are already blocked.
The result is predictable. Ramp-up takes longer. Mistakes repeat. Senior engineers spend more time answering questions than building.
Knowledge does not disappear, it just becomes inaccessible
Most teams already have plenty of knowledge. The problem is retrieval, not creation.
A decision was discussed in Slack. A tradeoff was documented in a pull request description. An architectural constraint was mentioned in a retro. Six months later, none of that is visible when someone touches the code again.
Research from Microsoft on developer productivity highlights that engineers spend a significant portion of their time searching for information or trying to understand existing systems rather than writing new code. The issue is rarely missing documentation. It is missing context.1
Knowledge that cannot be discovered at the moment of need is effectively lost.
This is why traditional wikis and documentation portals often fail. They require manual upkeep, they drift out of date, and they live separately from the actual work.
Good knowledge sharing follows the work. It does not sit next to it.
What effective onboarding actually optimizes for
Strong onboarding is not about speed alone. It optimizes for confidence.
A well onboarded engineer should understand:
- What systems exist and why they exist
- Where to safely make changes
- What has failed before and what must not break
- Who owns which areas and how decisions are made
Notice what is missing. It is not about memorizing APIs or learning every service. It is about building a mental map of the system and the organization.
That mental map comes from exposure to real work, real decisions, and real outcomes.
This is why the best onboarding programs look less like courses and more like guided exploration.
The hidden cost of poor knowledge sharing
When knowledge is not shared well, teams pay for it in subtle ways.
Senior engineers become bottlenecks because they are the only ones who know how things work. New hires hesitate to make changes, leading to slower delivery. Bugs repeat because historical context is missing.
Over time, teams become risk averse. People avoid touching unfamiliar parts of the system. Innovation slows down, not because engineers lack skill, but because the cost of mistakes feels too high.
This is one of the main drivers of burnout in senior engineers. They are not just writing code. They are constantly re explaining the past. They don't feel like they're making good progress anymore.
Better onboarding starts with better defaults
High performing distributed teams tend to share a few habits.
Make decisions traceable
Every significant technical decision should leave a visible trail. Not just what was done, but why it was done, and why that way.
Pull requests are an underrated knowledge base. Clear descriptions, links to discussions, and explicit tradeoffs turn code changes into long lived documentation.
The same applies to planning tools like Linear or Jira. Issues that capture intent, constraints, and success criteria age much better than bare task lists. Sometimes the key information is even in a comment thread below the issue.
Normalize writing things down once
The goal is not to document everything. The goal is to avoid repeating explanations.
If a question comes up more than once, it deserves a durable answer. That might be a short doc, a pinned Slack message, or a comment linked to a system.
Teams that do this consistently reduce onboarding friction without adding heavy process.
Teach through real work
Shadowing is most effective when it is concrete. Instead of generic walkthroughs, pair new hires on real issues. Let them see how decisions are made, how tradeoffs are discussed, and how reviews work.
This builds intuition faster than any onboarding checklist.
Use async by default
Distributed teams thrive when knowledge sharing does not depend on being in the same meeting.
Written updates, recorded demos, and structured retrospectives allow new hires to catch up without interrupting others. They also create an archive of how the team thinks.
Tools like Slack and Google Calendar work best when used intentionally. Clear channels, predictable rhythms, and visible ownership turn noise into signal.
Onboarding never really ends
One mistake many teams make is treating onboarding as a 30 or 60 day phase.
In reality, onboarding happens every time an engineer touches a new part of the system. Every reorg, every new product surface, every major refactor resets the learning curve.
This is why knowledge sharing should be continuous and ambient. It should happen as a byproduct of normal work, not as a special process.
Teams that scale well invest in systems that surface context automatically, instead of relying on memory or manual updates.
Where most teams get stuck
Even teams that value documentation and onboarding struggle with the same constraints.
People forget to update docs. Context lives across too many tools. No one has a full picture of what changed recently and why.
Engineering leaders often lack visibility into where knowledge gaps actually are. By the time issues surface, the cost is already paid in delays or incidents.
This is not a failure of discipline. It is a tooling gap.
Making knowledge visible without extra work
The most effective teams reduce friction by connecting existing signals.
Commits, pull requests, issues, discussions, and calendars already tell the story of what the team is doing. When those signals are linked, patterns emerge.
New hires can see how work flows from idea to implementation. Leaders can spot where context is missing. Teams can learn from past decisions without digging through history.
This is where tools like One Horizon come in.
Instead of asking engineers to document more, One Horizon helps teams surface context that already exists. It connects work across tools like GitHub, Slack, Linear, Jira, and calendars, and turns daily activity into a coherent narrative.
For onboarding, this means new engineers can explore what changed recently, why it changed, and who was involved. For leaders, it means visibility into how knowledge flows through the team, without adding meetings or manual reporting.
The result is faster ramp-up, fewer repeated questions, and teams that can scale without burning out their most experienced engineers.
Sign up today
The real goal
Great onboarding and knowledge sharing are not about perfection. They are about momentum.
When engineers feel safe exploring the system, confident making changes, and supported by visible context, teams move faster naturally.
Distributed work is not the problem. Invisible knowledge is.
Fix that, and everything else gets easier.
Footnotes
-
Forsgren, N., Humble, J., Kerr, M., et al. (2021). The SPACE of Developer Productivity. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-space-of-developer-productivity/ ↩
